Wednesday, February 3, 2010

Part Four - And the meds start dripping

Do you all remember i said in Part Two that i feel that “There are just to many mistakes he made, there are too many holes in the story.” Well maybe it may sound strange to you but if you read what CM told the police about what happend to Michael on june 25th the first thing you think is he killded him. But recently i took another look…and i found things. Those things combined with statements that Conrad Murray made himself or his lawyers made for him make it possible to let you think things could be way different than the way you saw them when you read it all for the very first time.

Now let’s take a closer look at one of the search warrants witch also includes a statement Conrad Murray give to the police. I will share this link with you http://www.scribd.com/doc/19058649/Michael-Jackson-search-warrant so you can take a look at it yourselfs. Hopefully that also makes it better to understand the things i’m writing down here. Please join the journey of my thoughts as i keep on writing.

When you take a look at page 18 of the search warrant and affidavit you can see that from line 15 Conrad Murray starts to talk about what happend on June 25th. I will guide you through the timeline when the meds start dripping.

The time and meds Conrad Murray give to Michael:
- 1.30AM 10mg of Valium tab.
- 2.00AM 2mg of Lorazepam injected in his IV
- 3.00AM 2mg of Midazolam injected in his IV
- 5.00AM 2mg of Lorazepam injected in his IV
- 7.30AM 2mg of Midazolam injected in his IV
-10.40AM 25mg of Propofol with Lidocane through an IV drip

Hey wait up a sec…didn’t a leaked report say Michael had a lethal amount of Propofol in his body? And the cause of death was ACUTE PROPOFOL INTOXICATION and a contributing factor was Lorazepam. I will forget about the Lorazepam her for a minute because i’m wondering about something else.

Now how can anybody have a lethal amount of something in the body if it’s given through an IV drip and can it be an ACUTE INTOXICATION at the same time? To me that doesn’t sound right at all. I mean when i hear the words ACUTE and LETHAL i think about something that is given at once and to much. But than again..that is my opinion, and maybe the coronor ment it in a different way than i’m taking it.

I guess it will come down to how much this LETHAL amount really was. And i’m sure the coronor is a very smart person who can calculate backwards and than determin how much Michael was given for real. Just think with me and maybe you agree here or maye you don’t. But do you think that if the LETHAL amount is much higher than Conrad Murray said it is still just an accident, or a stupid mistake?

Also there are some other questions i have…so please please please just stay with me again. We have the words of Conrad Murray telling us he only give 25mg Propofol, we have a coronor saying Michael’s death is a homicide. And the drugs that killed him is Propofol. To me it first sounded like well Conrad Murray give him the Propofol but he lied about the amount. And i really was like..hey what’s the hold up arrest this guy already..he admitted he give the Propofol, what more do you need than that.

Than i started thinking.. doesn’t the police and the DA have to proof that if the amount Conrad Murray mentiond is false that it was Conrad Murray who give that LETHAL amount? As far as we know there isn’t an eyewitness is there. So if there is no eyewitness who saw him do that, they would need another way to proof he give the lethal amount. I’m thinking about physicall evidence such as a fingerprint on the injection that contained the lethal amount of propofol.

Could it maybe be true that the rumour about the missing security tape is not just a rumour but that it’s really there. Maybe that missing security tape isn’t that missing after all and it could be part of the evidence they have. But if you think about them having that security tape that makes it even more strange that Conrad Murray isn’t arrested than. I mean we all expect Conrad Murray to be on that tape and that his lies are exposed on that tape. What if that tape tells us the oposite..what if it tells us the same things Conrad Murray told the police..Now that would explain why they keep telling us it’s a hard case, and that would also explain why Conrad Murray isn’t arrested yet.

3 comments:

  1. Bota difícil nisso.
    É difícil aceitar que esse Dr.Morte vai alegar que Aplicou algo que não era suficiente para mata-lo.
    Ele vai querer nos fazer acreditar que Michael morreu por si só.

    ReplyDelete
  2. If Murray did only give him 25mg then someone else would have had to give the lethal dose and I doubt if they would leave the tape there either. Unless they didn't know it was there but if it was someone Michael knew they probably knew the house security system.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Lethal just means able to cause death.

    Even a very small amount of certain chemicals when they are mixed can be lethal. It was the chemical reaction between the prop. and I guess some other drug in his system that caused the respiratory arrest which led to cardiac arrest.

    What they COULD mean by acute is that the reaction happened immediately after. I spoke to someone with good medical knowledge. He said the reaction would have taken place "almost immediately after the last IV bolus push"

    ReplyDelete